A EUROPEAN APPROACH TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: BETWEEN GEO-ECONOMIC AMBITIONS AND THE REVIVAL OF THE NORMATIVE POWER EUROPE THEORY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63177/mns.2025.14Keywords:
European Union, artificial intelligence technology, European Artificial Intelligence Act, regulatory framework, Normatiwe Power Europe, fundamental rights, geo-economics, open strategic autonomy.Abstract
With the entry into force of the European Artificial Intelligence Act in August 2024, the European Union (EU) became the first in the world to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for this advanced technology. The tension between the two leading goals of the newely established European governance model has been highlighted in the European studies. On the one hand, the Union seeks to protect fundamental rights and ethical principles and consider transparency requirements. On the other hand, it has focused on fostering innovation and strengthening the European technology sector. The paper analyzes the European approach to regulating artificial intelligence technology through the prism of the theoretical concept of the normative power of the European Union. The research is placed in the context of a global geopolitical and geoeconomic shift. The paper aims to examine whether the Artificial Intelligence Act reflects the EU’s value-based approach on the global stage, or whether it indicates the instrumentalization of rights in the function of achieving strategic autonomy and digital sovereignty of the EU as a supranational entity. Qualitative content analysis shows that the EU seeks to balance the protection of fundamental rights with the need for global positioning in the domain of advanced technologies. It is concluded that the European approach to artificial intelligence is neither exclusively normative nor exclusively geoeconomic. It embodies a new phase of the transformation of the European Union as an actor in a world where technological progress is intertwined with the logic of power, rather than human-centric social progress.
References
Bauerle Danzan, S. and Meunier, S. 2024. The EU’s Geoeconomic Turn: From Policy Laggard to Institutional Innovator, Journal of Common Market Studies 62(4), pp. 1097-1115. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13599;
Дабић, Д. 2025. Европска канцеларија за вештачку интелигенцију као центар стручног знања о вештачкој интелигенцији на нивоу Европске уније, Европско законодавство, Год XXIV, бр. 89, стр. 221–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18485/iipe_ez.2025.24.89.11;
Dabić, D. 2024. Ekonomske prognoze - izgledi povoljniji, oprez opravdan, Progovori o pregovorima, broj 104, str. 18-21 Интернет, https://issuu.com/beogradska.otvorena.skola/docs/progovori_o_pregovorima_104/22?ff, 7.04.2025;
Дабић, Д. 2017. Европска избегличка криза као изазов теорији о нормативној моћи Европске уније, У: Јанковић, С., Павловић, З. и Дабић, Д. Балканска мигрантска рута: између политике, права и безбедности, Београд: Институт за међународну политику и привреду и Покрајински заштитник грађана – омбудсман, АП Војводина;
Gordanić, J. 2022. The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on the right to access the internet as a human right, in: Igor Milenković, Bojan Vlaški (eds), Challenges and Perspectives of the Development of Legal Systems in the XXI Century, Faculty of Law, Banja Luka, pp. 189-184;
Ebers, M. 2024. Truly Risk-based Regulation of Artificial Intelligence How to Implement the EU’s AI Act, European Journal of Risk Regulation, pp. 1-20, doi:10.1017/err.2024.78;
Крастев, И. 2017, После Европе, Самиздат Б92: Београд;
Loesekrug-Pietri, А. 2019. France and Germany Must Change the Game, Project Syndicate, Интернет, https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/france-germany-eu-innovation-cybersecurity-by-andre-loesekrug-pietri-2019-02, 10/03/2025;
Manners, I. 2002. Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), pp. 235-258, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00353;
Mügge, D. 2023. EU AI sovereignty: for whom, to what end, and to whose benefit?, Journal of European Public Policy, 31(8), pp. 2200-2225. Доступно на: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2318475;
Pham, B. & Davies, S. 2024. What problems is the AI act solving? Technological solutionism, fundamental rights, and trustworthiness in European AI policy, Critical Policy Studies, DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2024.2373786;
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on Artificial Intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act), “OJ” L, 12.7. 2024;
Самарџић, С. 2016. поговор у: Минклер, Х. Сила у средишту: нови задаци Немачке у Европи, Албатрос Плус: Београд;
Stanković, N. 2021. Normativna moć kao aspekt spoljne politike EU u kontekstu pandemije Kovid 19. U: Stanović, N., Dabić, D. i Bandov, G., Razvojni pravci Evropske unije nakon pandemije Kovid 19, Beograd: Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu;
Feldstein, S. 2024. Evaluating Europe's push to enact AI regulations: how will this influence global norms? Democratization, 31(5), pp. 1049-1066. DOI:10.1080/13510347.2023.2196068;
Haroche, P. 2023. A ‘Geopolitical Commission’: Supranationalism Meets Global Power Competition, Journal of Common Market Studies 61(4), pp. 970-987. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13440;
Herranz-Surrallés, A., Damro, C. and Eckert, S. 2024. The Geoeconomic Turn of the Single
European Market? Conceptual Challenges and Empirical Trends. Journal of Common Market
Studies, Vol. 62, No. 4, pp. 919–937. Доступно на: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13591.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.