BETWEEN PROTECTION AND INTERNAL INFLUENCES: COURT PRESIDENTS AND JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63177/isc.2026.02Keywords:
court presidents, judicial independence, Bosnia and Herzegovina, High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council, disciplinary responsibilityAbstract
In contemporary scholarship, court presidents are sometimes conceptualised as an institutional manifestation of judicial self-governance, contributing to the strengthening of judicial independence by ensuring the efficient administration of courts, safeguarding professional standards, and acting as intermediaries between the judiciary and other branches of government. In this sense, their role may serve as an important safeguard against external pressures. Court presidents may play a key role in upholding the independence and impartiality of the judiciary, both at the institutional level and with respect to individual judges. At the same time, they may also emerge as a factor undermining internal judicial independence, particularly through pressures exerted on individual judges.
Owing to their extensive administrative and career-related competences, court presidents occupy structurally sensitive positions within the judicial system and may therefore be exposed to pressures from a variety of sources, not limited to the executive branch. Their authority over case allocation, internal court administration, and the professional advancement of judges confers considerable institutional significance on their office. In such circumstances, compliant or strategically aligned court presidents may serve as conduits for indirect forms of political or institutional influence over the judiciary. This risk highlights the need for a clearly defined and carefully tailored framework of responsibility specific to their role, rather than reliance solely on the general rules governing judicial accountability.
Based on a comparative analysis of the status and competences of court presidents across European jurisdictions, the paper offers a critical evaluation of the legal framework governing court presidents in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). Particular focus is placed on the current Law on the High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council of BiH, its 2023 amendments, and the new law proposal currently pending before the Parliamentary Assembly of BiH. Special attention is devoted to the legal framework governing the disciplinary responsibility of court presidents, as well as to the practice of the disciplinary bodies of the High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council of BiH.
References
Blisa, A., Kosař, D. 2018. Court presidents: the missing piece in the puzzle of judicial governance. German Law Journal 19(7), pp. 2031-2076.
Consultative Council of European Judges, Opinion no. 19 (2016) on the Role of Court Presidents (available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/ccje/ccje-opinions-and-magna-carta; accessed: 11.03.2026).
Dujić, G. 2018, Izlaganje na Konferenciji predsjednika sudova (16.05.2018. godine (available at: www.pravosudje.ba; accessed: 01.03.2026)
Išerić, H., Sahadžić, M., Banović, D. 2023. The Judiciary of Bosnia and Herzegovina, in Sahadžić, M. et al. (eds.) Citizens, Constitution, Europe: Glossary of Essential Constitutional Concepts in BiH. Sarajevo, pp. 313–320.
Kosař D. 2018. Beyond Judicial Councils: Forms, Rationales and Impact of Judicial Self-Governance in Europe. German Law Journal 19(7), pp. 1567-1612.
Kosař, D., Šipulová, K. 2025. Court presidents: power through informality. JUSTIN Working Paper Series, no. 2/2024, pp. 1-27 (available at: https://justin.law.muni.cz/media/3763182/kosar-sipulova_court-presidents-power-through-informality-2024.pdf; accessed: 15.03.2026).
Kosař, D. 2016. Perils of Judicial Self-Government in Transitional Societes. Cambridge University Press.
Marković, G. 2021. Ustavni lavirint: Aporije ustavnog sistema Bosne i Hercegovine. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
Milinković, I. 2021. Ogledi iz pravne etike I: Sudijska etika. Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci.
Parlov-Tkalčić v. Croatia. European Court of Human Rights. 2009 (available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-96426%22]}; accessed: 22.03.2026)
Shetreet, S. 2009. The normative cycle of shaping judicial independence in domestic and international law: the mutual impact of national and international jurisprudence and contemporary practical and conceptual challenges. Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol 10 No.1, pp. 275-332.
Decision of the First-Instance Disciplinary Commission for Judges of the HJPC BiH, No. 11-07-6-2413-4/2025 (available at: https://vstv.pravosudje.ba/vstvfo/B/141/kategorije-vijesti/1172/12029/12034; accessed: 27.03.2026)
Law on the High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council of BiH, Official Gazette of BiH, no. 25/2004, 93/2005, 48/2007, 15/08 and 68/23.
Law on Amendments to the Law on the High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council of BiH, Official Gazette of BiH, no. 68/23.
Recommendation CM/Rec(2010)12of the Committee of Ministers to member states on judges: independence, efficiency and responsibilities (available at: https://rm.coe.int/16807096c1; accessed: 11.02.2026)
The Universal Charter of the Judge, International Association of Judges – ICJ, 1999, 2017 (available at: https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/IAJ-Universal-Charter-of-the-Judge-instruments-1989-eng.pdf; accessed: 27.03.2026)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
