ДА ЛИ ЈЕ ПРАВДА ПРИВИЛЕГИЈА (САМО) РАЗВИЈЕНИХ ДРУШТАВА? ЈАВНЕ УСЛУГЕ КАО ФАКТОР ДОСТУПНОСТИ ПРАВДЕ ЗА ГРАЂАНЕ И ДРУШТВЕНОГ РАЗВОЈА

Veran STANČETIĆ

doi:10.63177/mns.2025.08

Authors

Veran STANČETIĆ Associate Professor, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Political Sciences, Republic of Serbia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5574-0132

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63177/mns.2025.08

Keywords:

Justice, Public Policy, Legal Framework, Infrastructure, Social Development.

Abstract

Правда, прокламована као универзално право, и даље остаје недостижна као реалност за многе људе широм света. Њен квалитет и практични домети битно су одређени географијом посматраног простора односно начином јавног управљања и квалитетом јавних услуга. Структурне неједнакости у погледу доступности правде нису случајна и непредвидива појава, већ су укорењене у политичким одлукама и институционалним аранжманима. Основна тврдња у овом раду је то да је правда нераскидиво повезана са инфраструктурним и административним капацитетима државе, те да владе морају бити схваћене као централни актери у омогућавању или онемогућавању адекватног приступа правном систему и правди уопште. Истицањем улоге јавних услуга (правна помоћ, системи за издавање личних докумената, саобраћајна инфраструктура, дигитални приступ и образовање), у овој анализи се заступа идеја правде као облика друштвене инвестиције. У чланку се даје приказ теоријске основе анализиране проблематике, затим се дијагностикују основне структурне препреке правди и анализирају индикативни и поучни примери из међународне праксе. На крају су дате практичне препоруке за креирање јавних политика у правцу праведнијег и инклузивнијег друштва.

References

Adeodato, R. and Pournouri, S., 2020. Secure implementation of e-governance: a case study about Estonia. Cyber Defence in the Age of AI, Smart Societies and Augmented Humanity, pp.397-429;

Bastos Lima, M.G., 2021. Governance: Solving or Reproducing Inequalities. The Politics of Bioeconomy and Sustainability: Lessons from Biofuel Governance, Policies and Production Strategies in the Emerging World, pp.49-66;

Baú, V., 2019. Radio, conflict and land grabbing in Sierra Leone: Communicating rights and preventing violence through drama. Media, War & Conflict, 12(4), pp.373-391;

Chatterjee, D., 2015. Justice for All: The Promise of Democracy in the Global Age. Ethics & International Affairs, 29(4), pp.489-498;

Denvir, C., Balmer, N.J. and Pleasence, P., 2013. When legal rights are not a reality: do individuals know their rights and how can we tell?. Journal of social welfare and family law, 35(1), pp.139-160;

Domingo, P. and O'Neil, T., 2014. The politics of legal empowerment. Legal mobilisation;

Flynn, E., 2017. Article 13 [Access to Justice]. In The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A Commentary (pp. 281-294). Springer International Publishing;

Gorea, B., 2018. ... And Justice For All. Legal Interpretation On Democratic Values. Curentul Juridic, 72(1), pp.13-26;

Griffiths, M.R. and Lucas, J.R., 1996. Codes, Sanctions and the State. In Ethical Economics (pp. 134-149). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK;

Hoddy, E.T. and Gready, P., 2020. From agency to root causes: Addressing structural barriers to transformative justice in transitional and post-conflict settings. Contemporary Social Science, 15(5), pp.561-576;

Islam, S., Moula, G. and Islam, M., 2015. Land rights, land disputes and land administration in Bangladesh-a critical study. Beijing L. Rev., 6, p.193;

Исипова, Л.Р., 2023. Правовая безграмотность подрастающего поколения и пути решения данной проблемы. Северо-Кавказский юридический вестник, (3), pp.17-22;

Jaiswal, P., 2024. Lok Adalats in India: A Comprehensive Analysis of Their Role in Facilitating Speedy Justice. Issue 3 Int'l JL Mgmt. & Human., 7, p.3002-3015;

Kästik, T., 2019, April. The impact of digital governance on the business environment: The case of Estonian tax and customs board. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 472-474);

Kuklys, W., 2005. Amartya Sen's capability approach: Theoretical insights and empirical applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg;

Lakoff, S.A., 1991. Human Rights and Democracy. In In the Presence of the Past: Essays in Honor of Frank Manuel (pp. 233-247). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands;

Lima, V. and Gomez, M., 2021. Access to justice: Promoting the legal system as a human right. In Peace, justice and strong institutions (pp. 1-11). Cham: Springer International Publishing;

Longman, T., 2009. An assessment of Rwanda's gacaca courts. Peace Review, 21(3), pp.304-312;

Maldonado, D.B., 2020. The Right to Access to Justice: its conceptual architecture. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 27(1), pp.15-33;

Manby, B., 2017. "Legal identity for all" and childhood statelessness. Worlds stateless children;

Manby, B., 2018. "Legal identity" and biometric identification in Africa. Newsletter of the American Political Science Association's Organized Section on Migration and Citizenship, 6(2), pp.54-60;

Marques, V.T. and Rebouças, G.M., 2017. Juizados especiais itinerantes e acesso à justiça: contribuições de uma análise legal e empírica para a compreensão da justiça itinerante no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Direito, 13(3), pp.495-513;

McQuoid-Mason, D., 2020. Access to justice and the need for a holistic approach to the delivery of legal aid services in developing countries: Lessons from South Africa. Jindal Global Law Review, 11(2), pp.309-337;

Muhumad, A.A., 2019. Impediments to Civil Registration: The case of Somali Regional State in Ethiopia. In Journal of Social Policy Conferences (No. 77, pp. 287-306). Istanbul University;

Nmehielle, V.O. and Madhava Menon, N.R., 2014. Opportunity, inclusion, and equity as imperatives for meaningful law and justice-guided development. World Bank Legal Rev., 5, p.3;

Nyseth Brehm, H., Uggen, C. and Gasanabo, J.D., 2014. Genocide, justice, and Rwanda's gacaca courts. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 30(3), pp.333-352;

O'Neill, O., 2001. Agents of justice. Metaphilosophy, 32(1‐2), pp.180-195;

Rawls, J., 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press;

Saxena, P., 2024. Technological Innovations in India's Legal Sector for Access to Justice During and Post Pandemic. Law and Development Review, (0);

Sen, A., 1985. Capabilities and commodities. Amsterdam and New York: North-Holland, 130;

Sepúlveda Carmona, M. and Donald, K., 2015. Beyond legal empowerment: improving access to justice from the human rights perspective. The International Journal of Human Rights, 19(3), pp.242-259;

Shackelford, S., 2008. In the Name of Efficiency: The Role of Permanent Lok Adalats in the Indian Justice System and Power Infrastructure. Manoj Kumar Sinha, GLOBAL GOVERNANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND HUMAN RIGHTS;

Stancil, P., 2016. Substantive equality and procedural justice. Iowa L. Rev., 102, p.1633;

Szreter, S. and Breckenridge, K., 2012, January. Recognition and registration: The infrastructure of personhood in world history. In Proceedings of the British academy (Vol. 182, pp. 1-36);

Tobin, E.A., Obi, A.I. and Isah, E.C., 2013. Status of birth and death registration and associated factors in the South-south region of Nigeria. Annals of Nigerian Medicine, 7(1), pp.3-7;

United Nations, Goal 16, https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal16;

Walker, M., 2005. Amartya Sen's capability approach and education. Educational action research, 13(1), pp.103-110;

Wambua, P.M., 2012. The jurisdictional challenges to the prosecution of piracy cases in Kenya: mixed fortunes for a perfect model in the global war against piracy. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 11, pp.95-113;

Witness Radio, 2025. Witness Radio petitions chief prosecutor: Want 34 community land rights defenders and activists released from prison. https://witnessradio.org/witness-radio-petitions-chief-prosecutor-want-34-community-land-rights-defenders-and-activists-released-from-prison/.